What does the Pentagon's confirmation on the reality of UFOs mean?

"PENTAGON ADMITS TO STUDYING UFOS. WHAT IT MEANS." Richard Dolan, The Big Picture. Live streamed May 25, 2019. Duration: 8:16 minutes.

We have moved into a new era in the public discussion of UFO or UAP. The Pentagon's latest admission, that the AATIP program did indeed study genuine UAP, is important. But the bigger picture is that we are inexorably moving in a direction toward this long-held secret continuing to unravel. Richard Dolan makes a clear and concise case as to why.

This live stream by Richard Dolan went down, for some unknown reason, after 7 minutes into the stream. There is a "part 2" below, where Mr Dolan continues his assessment of the official statement by the Pentagon that it has investigated, and still is investigating, UAP, or what most people call UFOs.

What the Pentagon is officially acknowledging or confirming is the reality of the UFO phenomena or "unidentified aerial phenomena" (UAP), which is the preferred term by the Pentagon.

For many years, those of us who have studied UFOs closely have known that something real is going on. It's still a puzzle, but we know it's real.

So, there is a risk that some people in the ufo community will miss the importance of the Pentagon's admission that it has studied, and still is, studying and investigating cases of UAP/UFOs. Dolan is in the video clip above and below, sharing his thoughts on what Pentagon's official statement about UAP or UFOs means.

Since September 2018, I have argued that a careful and selective disclosure process started in the late 2017 with "To The Stars Academy's" (TTSA) press conference. Two months later, the UFO articles by the New York Times, Politico, and the Washington Post entered the stage.

Today, documents verify the Department of Defense (DoD) released the now famous UAP/UFO videos. A couple of weeks ago, we had the official statement from the U.S. Navy about its interest in UAP or UFOs.

Richard Dolan seems to agree with my view that there's more than just an official announcement, but he calls it a "slow and controlled disclosure". Of course, a cautious strategy and patience are both wise and needed when trying to navigate through the complex UFO subject.

But listen to Mr Dolan yourself. Start with the 8 minute video above for some background of his talk, and then listen to "part 2", where Dolan delivers his most important points and arguments for his case that we are living in a disclosure era.

Below "part 2", and more of my thoughts on Mr Dolan's assessment on disclosure.

"PENTAGON ADMITS TO STUDYING UFOS. WHAT IT MEANS. PART TWO." Richard Dolan, The Big Picture. Live streamed May 25, 2019. Duration: 22:00 minutes.


According to Richard Dolan, the Pentagon's acknowledgement of studying "unidentified aerial phenomena" (UAP), combined with other new information, confirms the existence of UFOs. Furthermore,  Dolan argues that the "UFO secrecy has an expiration date".

I agree with both points made by Dolan. I have also mentioned several times on this blog that the truth about the UFO phenomena will eventually come out in the public domain. However, I haven't made a clear and sound case for a continuous release of information about UFOs and an end date to the secrecy, like Dolan does in "Part 2".

I am still ambivalent about recovered "spacecraft", but I will not go into my "pro" and "con" arguments about such dramatic elements of the disclosure narrative.

Except for bringing up one convincing argument for an actual cover-up. And that convincing argument is the public presentation by Mr Hal Puthoff in June 2018, which Dolan talks about in "part 2" above. Dolan talks about Puthoff's presentation at around the 9:30 minute mark.

I posted Puthoff's presentation on this blog last summer. You can listen to it, and read my thoughts on Puthoff's presentation here.

I respect the skepticism about what is going on with the UFO subject, and, more specifically, the skepticism against the people in the "To The Stars Academy".

Readers who have read my posts will know that I do not agree with that skepticism. At least not fully. But in the name of fairness and integrity, I will soon present information that goes against my standpoint of an ongoing, careful and selective disclosure, which I believe is driven by mostly benevolent intentions. But far from everyone in the UFO community agrees with me on that. And that is how it should be.

All perspectives are important in order to get a clear and accurate picture of what is going on with the UFO phenomena. We can't get too stuck on our own ideas about what's right or wrong.

Regardless of the label used, such as "disclosure" or "disinformation," and regardless of our current understanding of UFOs, we all seek the truth. The world has a right to know the truth.

Therefore, I think it is crucial that I present information and people with different perspectives of what is going on at the moment with "official confirmation/disclosure" or "Psyop".

Until then, take care!