http://www.openminds.tv/dr-eric-davis-investigating-and-experiencing-the-paranormal-april-30-2019/42333
Open Minds UFO Radio describes the work of Dr. Eric W. Davis, and what the interview is covering, like following:
Dr. Eric Davis: Investigating and Experiencing the Paranormal – April 30, 2019.
Open Minds UFO Radio: Eric W. Davis, Ph.D.the Chief Science Officer of EarthTech Int’l, Inc. is the Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin. Dr. Davis’ research specializations include breakthrough propulsion physics for interstellar flight, interstellar flight science, beamed energy propulsion, advanced space nuclear power and propulsion, directed energy weapons, future and transformational technology, general relativity theory, quantum field theory, quantum gravity theories, experimental quantum optics, and SETI- and . xenoarchaeology
Eric has spent decades working with Robert Bigelow and his paranormal investigation efforts, including the National Institute for Discovery Sciences, and Bigelow Aerospace and Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies (BAASS). The company he works for now, EarthTech International Inc., is working with the To the Star Academy to analyze anomalous materials. In this episode, we talk to Eric about how he got involved with paranormal research, his personal paranormal experiences on the Skinwalker Ranch, and thoughts of that investigation, and other relevant research he has worked on.
Read more about Dr. Davis here: EarthTech.org
The following link https://www.patreon.com/posts/26574518 takes you to an article by Alejandro Rojas on his blog. The headline and first paragraph of Roja´s article from May 3, 2019, are as follows:
Confirms They Released Navy F-18 FLIR UFO Videos DoD
A document leaked by KLAS and a letter from the DoD given to a governmentproves the Department of Defense (DoD) did release Navy videos related to UFO incidents, despite an earlier denial. documents researcher
All of the material posted yesterday May 11, 2019, and today May 12, 2019, is about the latest information on specifically the USS Nimitz 2004 UFO encounters, and the latest development of the - what I call and believe is a - careful and selective disclosure process of the UFO phenomena.
If you listen to the interview above with Dr. Eric W. Davis, you will find that Dr. Davis thinks that the concept of a planned or intentional disclosure of the UFO phenomena is a conspiracy theory. I highly respect Dr. Davis for all the work and time he has spent on the UFO phenomena, the Skinwalker Ranch, etc., but I disagree with him about "conspiracy theory". And I will soon tell you why.
First I want to say that we who are quite sure of the existence of an ongoing disclosure process should seriously listen to Dr. Davis and critically look at our standpoint: what reasons do we have to believe in what I call a careful and selective disclosure process? How have we reached our conclusion, or opinion, about an intentional disclosure process? Maybe "confirmation" is a more correct term for what is going on?
At around the 37:10 minute mark, Dr. Davis is saying that the US Government through the DoD has confirmed the reality of the UFO phenomena, or UAP. That is, the DoD is confirming that the US military has encountered unidentified flying objects, or unidentified aerial phenomena, that are showing aerodynamics, maneuverability, and other characteristics that are hard to explain with the current physics and technology we have on earth. And that is also what Alejandro Rojas is writing in his blog post above from May 3, 2019.
With all that said, I still think that an intentional disclosure process is a reality and is ongoing. Or perhaps a more correct way of thinking about what is going on at the moment, is that we are in an education- and a preparatory phase of the disclosure process. And this education- and preparatory phase is mostly going behind the scenes. We now know - which Mr.
Confirmation and disclosure of UFOs are, of course, two different things. But to be able to educate and prepare the public of the truth about the UFO phenomena you first have to confirm the validity of the phenomena, the reality of the phenomena. And to me, it seems like the strategy is to first educate and prepare politicians and people high up in the hierarchy of the Pentagon who are unfamiliar with all the valid data on UAP, or UFOs.
The way I think about what is going on at the moment is that, in a way, confirmation and disclosure is happening at the same time.
What has to be added to the DoD´s confirmation for it to transition into an undeniable disclosure? What has to be added is, of course, an official statement that in indisputable terms says that the US Government´s standpoint is that UAP, or UFOs, are not man made, not from the Earth. An official disclosure does not have to state what UFOs are, who or what is behind it, the intentions, and so on.
And here is where I disagree with Dr. Eric W. Davis. At least to some degree. Unofficially the DoD, DIA, CIA and other players in the study of the UFO phenomena, have been making exactly the statement that UAP very likely is not a man made phenomena/technology, not coming from earth, through people like Hal Puthoff, Chris Mellon, Luis Elizondo and others. People familiar with the UFO phenomena know the background of the mentioned persons.
So what are my reasons for believing in an ongoing careful and selective disclosure process? My main reason is that people like Hal Puthoff and Luis Elizondo would not be allowed to publicly talk about UFOs as not coming from earth. Not even as their personal opinions. Not allowed by whom? Obviously by their former (?) employers like the Pentagon and the CIA. Mr. Elizondo - who constantly is saying that he is bound by non disclosure agreements and cannot answer all questions - has in several presentations he made the last 6-7 months said that he thinks that "disclosure is happening right now" and that "disclosure is not an event, but a process." It seems thus that Dr. Davis and Mr. Elizondo disagrees whether disclosure is a "conspiracy theory" or not. Or even whether the right term is confirmation or disclosure.
At the moment I believe that we have a disclosure by proxy. A group of people - a faction - inside the Pentagon, DoD, CIA, etc., is
Or more correct, the general public is going to be educated about these facts further down the road. Right now, TTSA is focusing on people who have the power and influence to take the issue of UAP to the next level. Let us hope that those people of power and influence are going to make the right choices and take the right decisions on what and how to inform the general public about the UFO phenomena.
Why disclosure now? Probably because the power dynamics inside the Pentagon has changed; the faction "pro-disclosure" is today stronger than the faction against a disclosure. Another reason is probably geopolitical: Russia and China have, according to Hal Puthoff and others, come further in their studies of the UFO phenomena. A third reason may be the phenomena itself, or "the Others" themselves. Have the sightings by the military increased the last decade or so? Has the behavior of the UFOs changed? Have the encounters between the military and UAP taken another form? Perhaps the personnel in the different military branches - especially the Air Force and the Navy - are demanding to be taken seriously with their experiences and encounters with UAP?
What I am saying is that TSSA is nothing less than a disclosure project or initiative by a faction inside the Pentagon and from other government branches and private companies. TTSA is not acting totally independent or without restrictions from players in the background. Whether that is positive or negative I cannot determine at the moment. I am leaning towards the positive side, but I think it is still too early to determine either way with certainty. It is impossible for me or any other outside observer to know the true intentions of the people involved in TTSA (including those I speculate are in the background).
But with that being said, I think it is unfair to take away the good work that the public people in TTSA have done, and their efforts to further a more open and serious dialog about the UFO phenomena and paranormal phenomena. I am not saying that there is a "puppet master" in total control over TTSA. I think it is more of a collaboration, and co-creating a disclosure strategy, between the people in TSSA and a faction inside the Pentagon, the CIA, DIA, etc.
Now, I am reasonably sure of what I have claimed so far, but I am not 100 % certain. My reasons are mostly based on statements made by people like Hal Puthoff and Luis Elizondo. Specifically, statements they have made in recent presentations (which you can find on this blog), and Mr.
But also on the recent witness testimonies from the USS Nimitz 2004 UFO encounters, which you can watch and listen to on Simeon Hein´s YouTube channel. These eye witnesses were also allowed to go public by the Pentagon, is my guess. And soon after these eye witnesses (who for a reason did not have to sign any non disclosure agreements) bravely shared their experiences, the US Navy went public with its new guidelines for its personal to report UAP.
And of course, I base my claims on the long history of denials, lies, disinformation, etc., etc., about the UFO phenomena by particularly the U.S. Government. Other countries have been more open and transparent with their interest in and studies of the UFO phenomena.
However, that long historical record of lies and denials should not blind or mislead us from what is going on today. Yes, we should stay critical, use our common sense and discernment concerning everything our governments and militaries are claiming or not about their knowledge about the UFO phenomena. But dismissing everything as lies or disinformation on a knee jerk reaction is not going to help us in our pursuit for the truth. Sometimes past behavior is the best predictor for future behavior, but far from always.
The most important thing and crucial in all this, is not whether I am right or wrong about a careful and selective disclosure process. The only important and crucial thing is the truth about the UFO phenomena. Whatever the truth is and looks like, I do not want to live in an illusion or be trapped by wishful thinking of what is real or not. I want the raw and hard truth.
Thus, keep in mind that even if I try to base my claims on credible and valid information, material and people, and I try to be clear with when I am fairly certain or when I speculate, the elusive nature of the UFO phenomena sometimes makes it hard for me to differentiate between my own wishes, biases, and believes of the facts, and what the facts actually are (independent of the human mind).
Therefore, you should always be critical of my posts, the information and the people (their claims, opinions, conclusions) I present on this blog. If you really want to figure out what is correct or not, what is a fact or not, then you always have to make your own effort and take the time to find out for yourself. There are no short cuts to the truth. There never has been and probably never will be.
In many cases, using common sense is the most simple and most effective way of figuring out what is reasonable or not, fact or speculation, and so on and so forth. Today, common sense is underrated. Do not make that mistake. Instead, use your common sense.
Take care!
/Janne
No comments:
Post a Comment