Counter arguments against disclosure of the UFO issue

"DARK JOURNALIST & DR. JOSEPH FARRELL: FAKE ALIEN INVASION THREAT! THE VON BRAUN UFO CARD 2020." Published on DarkJournalist´s YouTube channel on May 10, 2019. Duration: 49:10 minutes.

DARK JOURNALIST & DR. JOSEPH FARRELL: FAKE ALIEN INVASION THREAT! THE VON BRAUN UFO CARD 2020.

BREAKTHROUGH EPISODE 

WERNHER VON BRAUN ALIEN INVASION CARD - POWER STRUGGLE OVER THE UFO FILE - TRUMP SPACE FORCE VS. DELONGE REID PODESTA TTSA - CIA FAKE UFO DISCLOSURE OP - KENNEDY REAGAN WHITE HOUSE BATTLE FOR X TECHNOLOGY - SECRET SPACE PROGRAM.

I said in my last post that I would share opinions that I don't agree with, specifically arguments against my views on an ongoing disclosure process on the UFO issue. 

If you have read most of my posts, then you are familiar with my guess of an ongoing, careful and selective disclosure process of the truth about the UFO phenomena. Furthermore, my current standpoint is that the people behind the disclosure process, and their intentions, are mostly benign.

And the following is very important: I am trying to base my standpoint on the information, the data, that the people in, for example, "To The Stars Academy" (TTSA) have been putting out there in the public domain since the late 2017. Also, on the outcomes of the information/data. 

 I am aware of and consider the backgrounds of the people in TTSA. I take into account the same people's somewhat persistent focus on the "threat" aspect of the UFO issue. Even if, at the moment, I think TTSA is making a genuine effort in facilitating disclosure, I do not believe in TTSA without question.

With that said, I still think the content (information/data on UFOs or UAP) is more relevant than the form (backgrounds of the people in TTSA).

Why do I want to present arguments and opinions about the recent news of the US government's serious interest in the UFO phenomena that go against my interpretation of the information and situation?

I can give several important reasons, but I mention:

1) The truth. No matter what we think and believe about the UFO phenomena in general, and disclosure or not in particular, we all have the right to know the unbiased truth about all aspects of the UFO phenomena. Whether we will like the truth, whether we can handle the truth, is another issue.

We need to look at different angles to figure out "what's really happening" with all the official news from the US Navy and the Pentagon.
Who is right or not in his or her assessment about "disclosure" or "deception" is insignificant in the bigger picture. The UFO phenomena do not care about our egos. The truth does not care about how elegantly we can "connect the dots" or about what we believe, assume, hypothesise, etc.

Eventually, the truth will come out in the public domain, and when it does, we will all look stupid (if we are still around to experience and know the truth).

2) The truth.

3) Integrity. I mean that in two ways: A) To stay as true as I can to the main purpose of my blog, which is to present information rather than convince. I may have gone off on a tangent from the blog's purpose in my five latest posts. B) To as detached as possible, interpret the information, the data. Confirmation bias is just one of many cognitive traps. One of the most effective ways to avoid confirmation bias is to stay open to, and consider other ways of looking at and interpreting the data.

Remember that the UFO phenomena is complex and multifaceted. The fundamental challenge with all kinds of information/data, is that you in more cases than not, can interpret the same set of data in various ways.

What we think of as significant in a set of data, and how we interpret a set of data, depends on a complex interplay between nature and nurture. The very reason you are interested in the UFO issue is going to influence what your perception picks up in a set of data, and how you interpret it. The cartoons and books you read in your childhood will influence what you think and believe about all aspects related to the UFO phenomena.

My point with the two last sentences above is, self awareness and self knowledge. Know yourself. Be aware of not only "what" you think, but more importantly, "how" and "why" you think what you think.

But above all, be aware of and know what you do not know. Being open to, and listening to other peoples´ opinions and perspectives can help you become aware of the gaps in your knowledge and understanding of a certain subject.

The word "phenomenon" comes from a Latin word that means "to shine forth." What "shines forth" in your perception of the UFO phenomena? Why?


OK, to the video interview above. I will not make any comments on the conversation between Daniel Liszt, aka "Dark Journalist", and Dr Joseph Farrell, more than that their conversation relates to "disclosure or deception", and to what the recent statements from the US Navy, etc., means, according to Mr Liszt and Mr Farrell.

 And just because these two gentlemen have a different view than me on what is going on with the UFO issue and a disclosure process, does not mean that I discredit all of their thoughts and work on our subject at hand.

So, I will not give counterarguments or point out where I think Mr Liszt and Mr Farrell are interpreting the data in a biased way. Remember, that is not the point of this post.

The point is to demonstrate that different people can look at the same set of data and come up with different interpretations and conclusions about what the data means, and/or the implications of the data.

Therefore, and as always, I encourage everybody to do their own research, to look at the data, and to analyse and interpret the data with clear judgment. Use your common sense (similar to "Ockham's razor") and make up your own mind about what the most reasonable meaning of the information is.

Then, the integrity part means staying within the borders of what the information shows. If you go beyond the borders of what the information with high certainty shows, then you have to be explicit that you are entering more speculative territory.

I am aware that I know little with a high degree of certainty about the UFO phenomena in general, and the careful and selective disclosure process in particular. I hope that I have not given the impression in my posts that I know for a fact that a disclosure process is a reality, because I do not know.

I think, or I believe, that an ongoing disclosure process is a reality. That is how I interpret the information, data that have come out from the "To The Stars Academy", the US Navy, the Pentagon, and other sources since late 2017. More correctly, I think we are in an educational- and preparatory phase of the careful and selective disclosure process.

On the other hand, I may very well be incorrect. As long as I am around to know the truth behind the UFO phenomena, I do not care whether I'm right or wrong about disclosure.