In a bombshell Politico article the US Navy confirms that UFOs are real and that they contend with them! This is history in the making, folks. This video is brought to you by UFO Jesus.
Some References: Simeon Hein's interviews:
Interview with PJ Hughes: https://youtu.be/dfxavE5B-IE
Interview with Gary Voorhis: https://youtu.be/qz2gdQaklBQ
Interview with Jason Turner: https://youtu.be/PHi5UfIu1wo
Interview with Kevin Day: https://youtu.be/bV6M4MKoLnk
Politico article: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/0...
And a YouTube upload by Richard Dolan on his take on the same topic:
The U.S. Navy recently stated that it is issuing new guidelines relating to UFOs or UAP. It's noteworthy that the Navy acknowledges the proliferation of unknown objects penetrating sensitive airspace, something that has occurred for decades. But another trend is at work: the ongoingof UFOs into UAP. Removing the baggage of the term UFO also means siphoning out the history of military confrontation, of crash retrievals, and even of apparent alien encounters. It's part of a slow rebranding can call Controlled Disclosure. process we
First, just like UFO Jesus, I highly recommend everyone interested in the latest developments of the USS Nimitz 2004 UFO incident(s) to look at Simeon Hein's YouTube channel, and specifically his interviews with eyewitnesses from the USS Nimitz 2004 UFO incident(s).
Second, Laura Geggel's article, "Navy Plans to Document UFO Sightings, But Keep Them Confidential", appeared in Live Science on May 2, 2019.
So, what do the Navy's openness with its new guidelines relating to UFOs and effort to destigmatize the UFO phenomena really mean? This announcement by the Navy reinforces the idea of a "slow, deliberate release" of UFO-information that began in late 2017. I have written about what I call a careful and selective disclosure process on many posts on this blog, for instance, here.
I believe that the world since late 2017 is in an education and preparation phase of this disclosure process. Now, is the Navy a part of the education and preparation phase? It does not seem like that considering the statement above by Joe Gradisher. But the openness of the Navy about its new guidelines for reporting UFOs suggests the Navy is playing along in the disclosure process of the UFO phenomena. A contradiction?
Not necessarily. Remember that the keywords in the ongoing disclosure process are "careful" and "selective." Or "controlled," as Richard Dolan calls the process. However we label the disclosure process, it's going to be very slow.
The "careful"-part can be a good thing since there is a huge amount of information about the UFO phenomena for the public to digest, and some parts of that information will be difficult for the public to handle; think John Mack's term "ontological chock."
The "selective" aspect of the current disclosure is more concerning, and everyone interested in UFOs needs to be vigilant. The truth about the UFO phenomena is not the business of only the military. Understanding the physics and technology behind, for example, the "Tic Tac" (USS Nimitz 2004 UFO incident), and what the knowledge could imply, concerns the whole of humanity.
Thus, the Navy's statement about its new guidelines relating to UFOs, or UAP, has in my world more of a symbolic value than any practical valuefor the disclosure process. Yes, it is great that the U.S. Navy is officially confirming the reality of UFOs and that the Navy is trying to destigmatize the phenomena. At the same time, I do not think that the Navy's new guidelines for reporting UFOs will speed up or facilitate openness and transparency in the ongoing careful and selective disclosure process. At least not soon.
Be vigilant and criticalof the selective part of the disclosure process.
Take care!
I believe that the world since late 2017 is in an education and preparation phase of this disclosure process. Now, is the Navy a part of the education and preparation phase? It does not seem like that considering the statement above by Joe Gradisher. But the openness of the Navy about its new guidelines for reporting UFOs suggests the Navy is playing along in the disclosure process of the UFO phenomena. A contradiction?
Not necessarily. Remember that the keywords in the ongoing disclosure process are "careful" and "selective." Or "controlled," as Richard Dolan calls the process. However we label the disclosure process, it's going to be very slow.
The "careful"-part can be a good thing since there is a huge amount of information about the UFO phenomena for the public to digest, and some parts of that information will be difficult for the public to handle; think John Mack's term "ontological chock."
The "selective" aspect of the current disclosure is more concerning, and everyone interested in UFOs needs to be vigilant. The truth about the UFO phenomena is not the business of only the military. Understanding the physics and technology behind, for example, the "Tic Tac" (USS Nimitz 2004 UFO incident), and what the knowledge could imply, concerns the whole of humanity.
Thus, the Navy's statement about its new guidelines relating to UFOs, or UAP, has in my world more of a symbolic value than any practical value
Be vigilant and critical
Take care!
No comments:
Post a Comment