In a bombshell Politico article the US Navy confirms that UFOs are real and that they contend with them! This is history in the making, folks. This video is brought to you by UFO Jesus.
Some References: Simeon Hein's interviews:
Interview with PJ Hughes: https://youtu.be/dfxavE5B-IE
Interview with Gary Voorhis: https://youtu.be/qz2gdQaklBQ
Interview with Jason Turner: https://youtu.be/PHi5UfIu1wo
Interview with Kevin Day: https://youtu.be/bV6M4MKoLnk
Politico article: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/0...
And a YouTube upload by Richard Dolan on his take on the same topic:
The U.S. Navy recently stated that it is issuing new guidelines relating to UFOs or UAP. It's noteworthy that the Navy acknowledges the proliferation of unknown objects penetrating sensitive airspace, something that has occurred for decades. But another trend is at work: the ongoingof UFOs into UAP. Removing the baggage of the term UFO also means siphoning out the history of military confrontation, of crash retrievals, and even of apparent alien encounters. It's part of a slow rebranding can call Controlled Disclosure. process we
First, just like UFO Jesus, I highly recommend everyone interested in the latest developments of the USS Nimitz 2004 UFO incident(s) to take a look at Simeon Hein´s YouTube channel, and specifically his interviews with eye witnesses from the USS Nimitz 2004 UFO incident(s).
Secondly, there was an article in "Live Science" by Laura Geggel on May 2, 2019, with the headline "Navy Plans to Document UFO Sightings, But Keep Them Confidential." The article in Live Science is mostly referring to an article in the Washington Post, to whom Joe Gradisher, a spokesman for the Office of the Deputy Chief Naval Operations for Information Warfare, said that "no release of information to the general public is expected" (from the Navy´s UFO-reporting system).
So what does the Navy´s openness with its new guidelines relating to UFOs and effort to
I believe that the world since late 2017 is in an education- and preparation phase of this disclosure process. Now, is the Navy a part of the education- and preparation phase? It does not seem like that considering the statement above by Joe Gradisher. But the openness of the Nayy about its new guidelines for reporting UFOs seems to support that the Navy is now playing along in the disclosure process of the UFO phenomena. A contradiction?
Not necessarily. Remember that the key words in the ongoing disclosure process are "careful" and "selective." Or "controlled" as Richard Dolan calls the process. However we label the disclosure process, we can be sure it´s going to be very slow.
The "careful"-part can be a good thing since there is a huge amount of information about the UFO phenomena for the general public to digest, and some parts of that information are going to be difficult for the general public to handle; think John Mack´s term "ontological chock."
On the other hand, the "selective"-part of the ongoing disclosure process is in my mind a bit more worrisome, and something that everyone interested in the UFO phenomena has to be vigilant about. The truth about the UFO phenomena is not the business of only the military. The knowledge about the physics and technology behind, for example, the "Tic Tac UFO" (USS Nimitz 2004 UFO incident), and the potential applications and consequences of that knowledge, is something that concerns the whole of humanity.
Thus, the Navy´s statement about its new guidelines relating to UFOs, or UAP, has in my world more of a symbolic value than any practical value
Be very vigilant and critical
Take care!
/Janne
No comments:
Post a Comment