Introduction
This post analyses the recent conversation between Mr Robert Bigelow and Mr George Knapp. Specifically, I will focus on the tensions in what I call Bigelow's UFO "disclosure-strategy".
 |
| Source. |
The talk between Knapp and Bigelow starts with the premise or idea that UFO disclosure is not so far away, compared to 30-40 years ago. The center of the talk is Bigelow's meeting with President Trump on January 6, 2026. In that meeting, Bigelow advised and encouraged the president to deliver the following confirmation regarding UFOs/UAP:
A non-human intelligence presence has been on Earth for a very long time, using spacecraft with performances completely beyond our capabilities and our known physics.
In the talk, Bigelow makes the sound claim that confirmation and disclosure are "welded together." That is, it would be very difficult and time-consuming to get to a worldwide disclosure without a presidential confirmation that some UFOs/UAP are of non-human origin and that "they" are here.
I agree with Bigelow on this. For instance, I have previously addressed the necessity of a top down "ontological acknowledgement" here, and why an eventual transformational disclosure matters here.
But the main purpose of this post is to identify and reflect on some tensions in Bigelow's reasoning on how to get to a disclosure process. Because I think that the identified tensions are essential to solve in order to enable both confirmation and disclosure. You can think of the "tensions" as constraints or barriers for mainly reaching a worldwide disclosure.
The main theme I have identified in Bigelow's disclosure-strategy is trust. And my interpretation is that some of the major tensions in Bigelow's reasoning on how to embark on a disclosure process are:
- Trust between different human actors. In the text below, I will focus on two actors or groups: the so-called "gatekeepers" (a term used in the talk) and the U.S. government, especially the executive branch.
- Trust between humans and non-human intelligence (NHI).
So, on a more general level, the main theme could be social relationships, since any constructive relationship is built and maintained on mutual trust, respect, and so on.
Initially, Bigelow's focus on trust and relationships surprised me positively. On the other hand, in what way could trust and relationships not be essential for a constructive disclosure process? So, I sympathise with Bigelow's focus on those themes as a necessary foundation for UFO/UAP disclosure. I say more about those themes in the section "Closing thoughts".
In the next section, I will focus on the tensions concerning the human side in Bigelow's reasoning about how to get to a disclosure process, i.e., the first point above about trust between different human actors or groups.
For the full context of what I discuss below, listen to the talk between George Knapp and Robert Bigelow in its entirety (click on the first link above).
Collective action dilemma as a barrier to UFO disclosure
This tension has structural similarities with a collective action dilemma. The main actors here are the government, the "gatekeepers" (both in the government and/or private contractors), and the citizens. Every actor or group has different rights, obligations, interests, credibility, etc., regarding the UFO issue and disclosure.