Wednesday 18 July 2018

More declassified UFO video releases? Probably, according to Dr. Hal Puthoff.


http://stardrive.org/stardrive/index.php/news2/science/23700-hal-puthoff-interview-on-uss-nimitz-ufo-close-encounter#.WyE8oGe7Ui8.google_plusone_share

Read carefully, and with a laser focus, the text written and edited by Jack Sarfatti with the title "Hal Puthoff interview on  USS Nimitz UFO close encounter." Sarfatti writes in his introduction:
In his address to the SSE/IRVA conference Puthoff became the third member of the TTS/AAS team to publicly discuss the FLIR video released to and published by the New York Times on December 16, 2017. As with Christopher Mellon and Luis Elizondo, he made it quite clear the advanced aerospace object was not of human design without saying it was of extraterrestrial origin.
So what Jack Sarfatti has done is to publish the talk, or presentation, that Dr. Harold "Hal" Puthoff held at the SSE/IRVA conference on the 8th of June, 2018, in Las Vegas. It is Dr. Puthoff´s talk I encourage you to read with laser focus, and carefully.

In the beginning of his talk, Dr. Puthoff says:
The third area, Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, I have not published anything in. Why? Because the program I was involved in, in the Pentagon and in the intelligence community has been Top Secret, behind-the-scenes and only recently has there been release of information about the program. So this is the first chance that I’ve had a chance to actually appear before the public and speak about details of the program and not go to jail. So I’m going to go along at a rapid clip; I’ve got a lot of information here. So here we go.

Whatever you find most interesting in Dr. Puthoff´s talk, and whatever analysis and interpretation you make of the content in Dr. Puthoff´s talk, do not miss the most obvious and important thing in what Dr Harold Puthoff is saying. The following is my interpretation of the most obvious and important "message" in Dr. Puthoff´s talk:

We ("we" as in the know in the government, military, intelligence, scientific and private sector in U.S. and other countries) are far, far beyond the question if the UFO phenomenon (the physical aspect) is real or not. The scientific evidence shows beyond any reasonable doubt that the UFO phenomenon is real.
We are almost certain that these UFOs, or Advanced Aerospace Vehicles, do not pose a threat to national security. We are certain - but are not allowed to say it in public - that these UFOs are not constructed or maneuvered by a human intelligence.
We continue to study the UFO phenomenon because we want to be first with understanding and developing technological applications from our findings (it is the same old arms race but some of us want to use the new and exotic technology and energy sources for peaceful purposes).
"We who are in the know" do not see eye to eye on many of the issues, problems and dilemmas surrounding the UFO phenomena, for example, on the question of disclosure or not.
Some of us have decided to change the media's and the public's perception of the UFO phenomena from a woo woo-subject to a serious and scientifically significant subject. In that way, we are hoping the pressure for a disclosure from informed citizens will be too strong for politicians and lawmakers to ignore.

My interpretation may be wrong in parts or as a whole. I may have missed relevant and interesting points in Dr. Puthoff´s talk. And, of course, the are many questions about the different topics and aspects in Dr. Puthoff´s talk that comes to mind.

One question would be: Who is giving Dr. Puthoff and the other people behind "To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science" (TTSA), the clearance to publicly talk about sensitive information on the UFO subject, and implicitly say that UFOs/UAPs/AAVs (whatever acronym you want to use) are not from earth?

I know that many people in the UFO community are very suspicious towards the individuals involved in TTSA, and strongly question the agenda with the whole initiative. And perhaps suspicious for good reasons, since the individuals have been (and probably some of them still are) working for the "enemy side." 

But I do not think that everyone on the "enemy side" are thinking in the same way, have the same values, see things in the same way, have the same agenda, etc. I can back that up with basic group psychology and group dynamics. Sooner or later there is going to be tension and conflict in any kind of group of people. Sooner or later a group is going to be divided in factions with "informal" leaders. More often than not, those tensions and factions are caused by "bad chemistry" between two individuals, rather than strong differences in opinions or values.

Also, and always, remember the universal rule of change: Nothing stays the same, everything is in a constant change (even if the change goes very slow and it is not visible to the naked eye).

What I am trying to say is that I think - I am quite certain - big changes has, and is, taking place in the ranks of the so called "power elite" behind the scenes. Now this is a difficult question, so I am not going to elaborate more on it here and now, but suffice to say is that the power elite (whoever they are) has been divided into at least two factions with different views on what to do with the UFO phenomena/subject.

 At the moment, I believe that Dr. Harold Puthoff and the other individuals involved in TTSA (both the known and currently unknown individuals) are sincere and honest with their motives and goals. I believe TTSA is part of a bigger constellation of people from various departments, agencies, companies, organisations and individuals in the government (both in and outside the USA), that wants to end the "truth embargo" on the UFO phenomena.

Now, many people in the UFO community are arguing that there for a long time has been a "secret space program", so what TTSA wants to accomplish in form of new and exotic propulsion systems and other kinds of new technology, is just like inventing the wheel all over again.

I do not know if there is a secret space program or not. Maybe, maybe not. In my mind that is not the point or the relevant aspect to focus on right now. What can you and I do if there is such a  thing as a secret space program, or a breakaway civilisation that Richard Dolan is taking about? Can we stop it? No. Can we expose it (if it exists)? Perhaps, but then we need the help from guys like Dr. Harold Puthoff and initiatives like TTSA.

How? Well, as I  see it, TTSA are trying to empower the media and the public, politicians and law makers, with the information they are coming out with related to the UFO phenomena. I think the first step in TTSA`s plan is to make the UFO phenomena a legitimate subject to be interested in and openly and seriously discuss. For instance, they want the world of academia to be more engaged in the UFO subject and they want to make it easier for people with a lot to loose to either start researching the UFO subject, to come forward as witnesses of a UFO sighting/encounter and/or come forward with crucial information and material on issues related to the UFO phenomena.

I think most of us interested in and following the UFO subject, realize that disclosure is not going to be a "top down" process. It going to be a "bottom up" process. I believe TTSA wants to support and trigger that bottom up process.

Another question is: Why now? Why release the "Tic Tac", "Gimble" and other UFO videos at this point in time? I do not have any good answer to that question. I can only speculate that it has to do with changes within the power elite and those changes are mostly taking place behind the scenes. We also have to zoom out and take a birds view on what is happening in the world in general. The question has to be looked at from different levels of analysis, but at the moment the question is too complex for me, and there is too much information I am not aware of. So, any attempt to answer the question would be guess work from my part.


Instead I encourage you to carefully and thoughtfully read Dr. Puthoff´s talk, form your own opinions and interpretation of what is being said, hinted at and, perhaps, revealed in his talk. And take into account the context; where was the talk being held, why and to who?

Enjoy and take care!

Janne



No comments: