US Senator Marco Rubio Speaks Out About UFOs

"NEW INTERVIEW: US Senator Marco Rubio Speaks Out About UFOs." Posted on brian hanley's YouTube channel on July 17, 2020. Duration: 2:12 minutes.

"This interview was conducted by investigative reporter Jim DeFede".

A short, but what may very well turn out to be a historical, interview with Senator Marco Rubio for CBS Miami. Even though the interview is short, and Rubio repeats his main premise ("national security") as to why the US government needs to study UFOs, he also says some interesting things.

These are the most important things Rubio said, in my opinion, and how I understand them within the larger context of the current governmental transparency on the UFO issue.

• At the beginning of the interview, Rubio says that UFOs/UAPs are flying over our military bases and places where military exercises are conducted. 

Does Rubio mean nuclear weapon bases and other military installations over land when he uses the term "military bases"? I believe he does, since he probably with "places where military exercises are conducted," is referring to the USS Nimitz 2004 encounters, etc. This is interesting since the mainstream media has not yet reported much on UFO incursions over nuclear weapon bases. Former Senator Harry Reid has said that at least 80 % of the data from the Pentagon's UFO program "Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program" (AATIP) is public, and for anyone interested to see. Including reports/evaluations/assessments of UFO incursions over nuclear weapon bases in very recent times. So, it is not a coincidence that the first season of "Unidentified: Inside America's UFO investigation", had one or more episodes on nuclear weapon bases and UFOs. 

• During the first minute, Rubio says that he frankly thinks that it could be better for the US if those UFOs/UAPs are something from outside of the earth than those UFOs representing a technological leap by Russia, China, or some other adversary to the US. I think during the second minute, he expresses in certain terms that those things flying over and around military bases "are not ours." 

If that is Rubio's honest opinion based on what he has been briefed on UFOs/UAPs, then we are down to two alternatives: Either, for example, the "Tic Tac" is a technology from another nation than the US, or the "Tic Tac" represents a technology not made by human hands. 

Add to this that Rubio mentions that other nations have had similar military UFO encounters and incursions as the US. So, is it a private group or corporation that is behind this advanced technology? Is it a breakaway civilisation? I am quite certain the answer is no to both alternatives. Despite what is said in the Wilson documents (and under the assumption the content is true). 

• This point is very important. Rubio reiterates that the UFOs reported by the US military (mainly by the US Navy) "are not ours", and "we do not know who´s they are." 

Think about what Rubio is saying with those two statements. Add that he has already said that other nations have had similar UFO encounters. So, it is not the US flying over its own or other nations' nuclear weapon bases or carrier strike groups. And I doubt that Russia or China are flying over their own nuclear weapon bases or risking the security of their own pilots. So, is Russia, China, or some other nation flying over and around US military bases and carrier strike groups? Very unlikely, because the US military probably has the most sophisticated radar technology (and other signal detection capabilities) in the world. That is, a military technology that can differentiate between a bird and an aeroplane, between a Russian MiG and a drone, etc.. 

So, when Rubio says that those UFOs are not the US government's and that the US government do not know who is behind those UFOs, I believe 1) that Rubio is honest, 2) that Rubio with a high degree of certainty knows that those UFOs are not from this earth. That is, he can still claim that we do not know who is behind the "Tic Tac". Which makes the next and final point intriguing.

• If I am right in what I have said so far, then why is Rubio saying that the US government's data on UFOs do not necessarily fall into the mould of classified information? He is referring here to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence's directive to the relevant parts of the US military and intelligence agencies to produce a public UFO report (see pp. 11-12 in the linked document). 

As far as I know, that the Intelligence Act for 2020-2021 is yet to be adopted, but let us entertain the Act will be adopted. Why not a classified report (some parts would/will be classified)? Well, if Rubio has got accurate data on UFOs, then he knows that that advanced technology does not originate from the US government. Therefore, no military secrets are jeopardised, and the UFO report can be made public. The same goes if the UFO data shows that the technology does not originate from another nation on the earth. 

My guess is that if the UFO report is produced, then the final assessment, or conclusion, will echo Rubio's words in the interview above: the UFOs/UAPs are not from the US government, we do not know who they belong to, and The Phenomenon is unexplained.

That would be a step forward in the disclosure process. Because this time around it will not be like with "Project Blue Book" or the "Condon Report." Too much credible data about UFOs is already out in the public domain. Too many senators and congressional representatives are at this point aware of the seriousness of the UFO issue. In other words, too much toothpaste is out of the tube. 

A public UFO report would encourage mainstream journalists and scientists to investigate UFOs without the fear of ridicule.