The UFO phenomenon is real, but no one can prove who or what is causing it. This blog explores the research done over many decades, showing that the UFO phenomenon is of profound existential and scientific significance.
"I-Team: Former Sen. Reid wants UFO studies made public." Posted on 8 News NOW Las Vegas YouTube channel on the 27th of February 2019. Duration: 5:10 min. Harry Reid, a former Senator, believes Russia and China have had and still have their own UFO programs.
That piece of information is of course nothing new or controversial for UFO enthusiasts. In fact, in the interview by George Knapp, former Senator Reid is not saying anything new or controversial.
So, why post the interview? Personally, I think the most interesting thing in the interview is that Mr Harry Reid is saying that "there are pieces of evidence" with a mischievous smile. Of course, Mr Reid does not want to say what nature those "pieces of evidence" are or look like, and he claims that he just heard of it as a rumour.
But the interesting part for me is that Mr Reid's claim about "pieces of evidence" (followed by his mischievous smile) may tie into Dr Eric W. Davis´ claims about the U.S. government having crash retrieval programs until 1989. With no success, according to Dr Davis. You can listen to Dr Davis talk about the topic in my previous post here.
So, are we getting the correct information about the UFO phenomena? Or is there a faction inside and outside the U.S. government that has hijacked - what I call - the educational, or preparation, phase of the disclosure process?
"George Knapp Back engineering UFOs with Present or Near future Technology." Posted on COAST TO COAST AM OFFICIAL YouTube channel on the 17th of March, 2019. Duration: 39:29.
COAST TO COAST AM. Davis says that the efforts of Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies (BAASS) and the Pentagon UFO program that was recently revealed were honest and legitimate programs to use the observed properties of UFOs to determine if they could be utilized or back-engineered with present or near-future technology. In fact, Davis said that he and others were tasked with researching "white papers" to determine if in at least 50 years in the future, humans could produce aircraft that could perform the observed characteristics of UFOs, which he said appear to be "tech that is not made on Earth by humans." As for skeptics who say that Navy and other pilots are poor observers whose testimony cannot be trusted, Davis said that as combat experts, "these guys cannot afford to have poor observational skills." Davis also emphasized more than once that “poltergeist or psychic phenomena are a major aspect” of UFO encounters.
The information from the second hour of Dr Eric Davis's radio interview from June 24, 2018, which I heard last summer, is important and worth remembering. Why? Well, if you have ears to hear with, listen. Listen closely.
For example, listen attentively at:
1) The segment of the interview that starts at the 22:55 minute mark and lasts until 28:40 minutes. Dr Eric Davis talks about the psychic or poltergeist aspect being a key aspect of understanding the UFO phenomena. Dr Davis shares his personal experiences on the Skinwalker Ranch. According to him, even battle-hardened Marines are afraid of the paranormal occurrences at Skinwalker Ranch.
2) The segment that starts at the 28:40 minute mark and lasts until 32:20 minutes. Here, Dr Davis answers the first caller's question about government crash retrieval programs.
I agree with Dr Davis and others like Jacques Vallée about the psychic phenomena being a key aspect of the UFO phenomena. Or let me call it the "consciousness aspect" of the UFO phenomena. Dr Davis seems genuine to me about his personal experiences at Skinwalker Ranch.
With Dr Davis' statements about the crash retrieval programs and attempts at back engineering UFO technology, I simply have to take his word for it. I do not think Dr Davis is lying or feeding disinformation intentionally, but I cannot know for certain that Dr Davis himself has not been fed lies or disinformation by the Defence Intelligence Agency, or by other players involved in the UFO phenomena.
But he shares the information very matter of fact and like he is sure about it. So, at the moment, I am not sure what to make of the information about crash retrieval programs and attempts at back engineering.
As always, have an open and a critical mind. Do your own research and form your own opinions.
"Dr. Roger Leir & George Knapp discuss the Turkey UFO Case - Coast to Coast March 31, 2013." Published on Turkey UFO Incident´s YouTube channel 13/4 2013.
For a thorough background to the "Turkey UFO case", or the "Kumburgaz UFO case 2007-2009", go to the following link: http://turkeyufocase.blogspot.com/
The Turkey UFO case - that includes several sightings by several and different people between the years 2007 and 2009 - is well documented and well researched. As you can read and watch at turkeyufocase.blogspot.com, many academics and technically skilled people have analysed the case, especially the extraordinary video of the beings sitting in one of the UFOs.
Even the Turkish government has openly been involved with analysing the case and the videos.
And if I have not missed any recent developments, the video of the UFO with beings in it, is still not determined to be real or fake. I have some problems with and questions about the events leading up to the most famous video with the beings in a UFO, but I may write about them in a post in the future.
Dr Roger Leir passed away in 2014. He was well known among UFO enthusiasts for his work on alleged alien implants. Dr Leir became a witness to one of the UFO sightings in Turkey, and he saw when the most famous and debated video with the beings was filmed. That is what Dr Leir is mostly talking about in the interview above with George Knapp.
Be open-minded, and skeptical of the Turkey UFO case. Only form an opinion or draw a conclusion after you have taken a serious look at the case.
"Edition 1: Dr. Jack Sarfatti on the Physics of the 'Tic Tac' UFO." Posted on The Stardrive Report YouTube channel, on the 29/12 2018.
This video is about new physics discoveries on how UFOs like the "Tic Tac' are able to fly using very small amounts of energy. We discuss the political and military ramifications of this disruptive technological surprise in the light of Trump's replacement of General Mattis by Patrick Shanahan, the former student of his uncle, MIT Professor John Trump. Shanahan is allegedly the man who released the information we discuss and he has also championed the creation of the US Space Force.
If you are not familiar with Dr Jack Sarfatti, his work in theoretical physics and consciousness, you can read his CV and some of his research papers on the following link: https://jacksarfatti.academia.edu/
Since approximately a month back, the 38 Defense Intelligence Reference Documents (DIRDs) have been made public, or at least most of them. I think the paper by Kit Greene on the biological effects on human tissue is still classified. You can read more about the DIRDs, their purpose, and titles on this excellent blog: https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2018/06/those-defense-intelligence-reference.html
I believe the DIRDs not to be merely "thought experiments" about future technology and possibilities, but a description of what we actually know and understand about the physics and technology behind UFOs, or AAVs (Advanced Aerospace Vehicles). Or at least, knowledge and understanding we are close to having. "We" are people like Eric W. Davis, Hal Puthoff, and the other authors of the DIRDs.
Dr Jack Sarfatti also seems to be one in the know, or very close to understanding "the magic" behind objects like the "Tic Tac." At least, according to himself. Since I am not a scientist, I do not have the competence to assess the validity of Dr Sarfatti's theoretical model of the flight characteristics of the Tic Tac.
But as a layperson, I think it is interesting to listen to what Dr Sarfatti is saying in the interview above, and compare it with what, for example, Hal Puthoff is writing about "engineering the space-time metric."